🎉 亲爱的广场小伙伴们,福利不停,精彩不断!目前广场上这些热门发帖赢奖活动火热进行中,发帖越多,奖励越多,快来 GET 你的专属好礼吧!🚀
1️⃣ #TokenOfLove# |广场音乐节打 CALL
为偶像打 CALL,Gate 广场送你直达 Token of Love!泫雅、SUECO、DJ KAKA、CLICK#15 —— 你最想 pick 谁?现在在广场带上 歌手名字 + TokenOfLove 标签发帖应援,就有机会赢取 20 张音乐节门票。
详情 👉 https://www.gate.com/post/status/13214134
2️⃣ #GateTravel旅行分享官# |晒旅程赢好礼
广场家人们注意啦,Gate Travel 已经上线。带话题发帖,分享你的 Gate Travel 旅行体验、心愿清单、使用攻略或趣味见闻,就有机会获得旅行露营套装、速干套装、国际米兰旅行小夜灯等好礼!
详情 👉 https://www.gate.com/post/status/13172887
3️⃣ #内容挖矿# |发帖还能赚钱
广场长期活动进行中,最高可享 10% 手续费返佣!发布优质内容,如行情解析、交易观点等,吸引更多用户点赞和评论。若用户在互动后 180 分钟内完成现货或合约交易,你将获得最高 10% 的手续费返佣!
详情 👉 https://www.gate.
US Treasury’s DeFi ID plan is ‘like putting cameras in every living room’
The US Treasury is exploring whether identity checks should be built directly into decentralized finance (DeFi) smart contracts, a move critics warn could rewrite the very foundations of permissionless finance.
Last week, the agency opened a consultation under the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act), which was signed into law in July. The Act directs the Treasury to evaluate new compliance tools to fight illicit finance in crypto markets.
One idea was embedding identity credentials directly into smart contracts. In practice, this would mean a DeFi protocol could automatically verify a user’s government ID, biometric credential, or digital wallet certificate before allowing a transaction to proceed.
Supporters argue that building Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks into blockchain infrastructure could streamline compliance and keep criminals out of DeFi.
“Real-time monitoring for suspicious activity can make it easier for platforms to mitigate risk, detect and ultimately prevent money launderers from using their networks to wash the proceeds from some of the world’s worst crimes,” Mitchell said.
Related: GENIUS Act to spark wave of ‘killer apps’ and new payment services: Sygnum
DeFi ID checks: protect data or risk surveillance?
Mitchell acknowledged the privacy tradeoff but argued that solutions exist. “Only the necessary data required for monitoring or regulatory audits should be stored, with everything else deleted. Any data that is held should be encrypted at row level, reducing the risk of a major breach.”
However, critics say the proposal risks hollowing out the core of DeFi. Mamadou Kwidjim Toure, CEO of Ubuntu Tribe, compared the plan to “putting cameras in every living room.”
“On paper, it looks like a neat compliance shortcut. But you turn a neutral, permissionless infrastructure into one where access is gated by government-approved identity credentials. That fundamentally changes what DeFi is meant to be,” Toure told Cointelegraph.
He warned that if biometric or government IDs are tied to blockchain wallets, “every transaction risks becoming permanently traceable to a real-world person. You lose pseudonymity and, by extension, the ability to transact without surveillance.”
For Toure, the stakes go beyond compliance. “Financial freedom relies on the right to a private economic life. Embedding ID at the protocol level erodes that and creates dangerous precedents. Governments could censor transactions, blacklist wallets, or even automate tax collection directly through smart contracts.”
Related: GENIUS Act yield ban may push trillions into tokenized assets — ex-bank exec
Who gets left behind?
Another concern is exclusion. Billions of people globally still lack formal identification. If DeFi protocols require government-issued credentials, entire communities, migrants, refugees and the unbanked risk being locked out.
“It may restrict access for users who prefer anonymity or cannot meet ID requirements, limiting DeFi’s democratic nature,” Toure said.
Data security is also a flashpoint. Linking biometric databases to financial activity could make hacks more catastrophic, exposing both money and personal identity in a single breach.
Critics stress that the choice isn’t binary between crime havens and mass surveillance. Privacy-preserving tools like zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) and decentralized identity (DID) standards offer ways to verify eligibility without exposing full identity.
With ZKPs, users can prove they are not on a sanctions list or over 18 without revealing who they are. DID frameworks allow users to hold verifiable credentials and selectively disclose them. “Instead of static government IDs, users hold verifiable credentials they selectively disclose,” Toure said.
Magazine: Scottie Pippen says Michael Saylor warned him about Satoshi chatter